<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The credit crunch: A capital bypass for life sciences?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/24/the-credit-crunch-a-capital-bypass-for-life-sciences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deals.venturebeat.com/2007/08/24/the-credit-crunch-a-capital-bypass-for-life-sciences/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:57:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DV Henkel-Wallace</title>
		<link>http://deals.venturebeat.com/2007/08/24/the-credit-crunch-a-capital-bypass-for-life-sciences/comment-page-1/#comment-496246</link>
		<dc:creator>DV Henkel-Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 08:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/24/the-credit-crunch-a-capital-bypass-for-life-sciences/#comment-496246</guid>
		<description>The link is tenuous at best.  VC investments are hardly liquid (post capital call anyway) and life sciences have the longest time-to-exit (though the ones with successful exits tend to be quite good).  The alternatives are quite liquid (as you can tell with the speed of which the credit crunch can develop).

In short I think the argument is a stretch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link is tenuous at best.  VC investments are hardly liquid (post capital call anyway) and life sciences have the longest time-to-exit (though the ones with successful exits tend to be quite good).  The alternatives are quite liquid (as you can tell with the speed of which the credit crunch can develop).</p>
<p>In short I think the argument is a stretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ogan Gurel</title>
		<link>http://deals.venturebeat.com/2007/08/24/the-credit-crunch-a-capital-bypass-for-life-sciences/comment-page-1/#comment-495336</link>
		<dc:creator>Ogan Gurel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturebeat.com/2007/08/24/the-credit-crunch-a-capital-bypass-for-life-sciences/#comment-495336</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that the interest rate relationship is not a hard one.  But there certainly is a stimulus – in the context of higher interest rates (and higher inflation) for investors to seek higher reward (and hence higher risk) venues.  

Whether this translates directly into life sciences venture funding (relative to other capital allocation) is a matter of more than just interest rates, but certainly a phenomenon that I think both of us agree will be closely watched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that the interest rate relationship is not a hard one.  But there certainly is a stimulus – in the context of higher interest rates (and higher inflation) for investors to seek higher reward (and hence higher risk) venues.  </p>
<p>Whether this translates directly into life sciences venture funding (relative to other capital allocation) is a matter of more than just interest rates, but certainly a phenomenon that I think both of us agree will be closely watched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
