<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux OS software co., MontaVista, raises $21M</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/05/linux-os-software-co-montavista-raises-21m/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deals.venturebeat.com/2006/12/05/linux-os-software-co-montavista-raises-21m/</link>
	<description>News About Tech, Money and Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:46:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Interested Observer</title>
		<link>http://deals.venturebeat.com/2006/12/05/linux-os-software-co-montavista-raises-21m/comment-page-1/#comment-14936</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.venturebeat.com/wire/2006/12/05/linux-os-software-co-montavista-raises-21m/#comment-14936</guid>
		<description>This brings MV funding to $96M(?), and still not profitable. These guys can&#039;t seem to get their act together. Looking at their product portfolio they have, and continue, to concentrate on the least economically viable part of the segment - the Linux kernel. WindRiver has surpassed them in Linux revenue. After 6+ years they just don&#039;t have a viable exit. Too bad - three to four years ago they had a chance to be real player. Now they&#039;re rapidly becoming one of the Living Dead. Bad management (CEO asleep at the wheel, obviously poor product portfolio bets) and bad strategy (not building &#039;proprietary&#039; value or adding significant user value beyond the kernel).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This brings MV funding to $96M(?), and still not profitable. These guys can&#8217;t seem to get their act together. Looking at their product portfolio they have, and continue, to concentrate on the least economically viable part of the segment &#8211; the Linux kernel. WindRiver has surpassed them in Linux revenue. After 6+ years they just don&#8217;t have a viable exit. Too bad &#8211; three to four years ago they had a chance to be real player. Now they&#8217;re rapidly becoming one of the Living Dead. Bad management (CEO asleep at the wheel, obviously poor product portfolio bets) and bad strategy (not building &#8216;proprietary&#8217; value or adding significant user value beyond the kernel).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
